Is it possible to use the output of a class template argument for a class Cfrom the definition of one of the member functions C? ... or am I forced to write my helper class make_c, as in C ++ 03?
Consider this minimized and simplified scenario that creates a chain of arbitrary functional objects:
template <typename F>
struct node;
template <typename FFwd>
node(FFwd&&) -> node<std::decay_t<FFwd>>;
The class nodestores a function object that is initialized with a perfect transfer. I need a guide for extracting here to decayfunction type object.
template <typename F>
struct node
{
F _f;
template <typename FFwd>
node(FFwd&& f) : _f{std::forward<FFwd>(f)}
{
}
template <typename FThen>
auto then(FThen&& f_then)
{
return node{[f_then = std::move(f_then)]
{
return f_then();
}};
}
};
node .then , node ( , ). .then...
auto f = node{[]{ return 0; }}.then([]{ return 0; });
... :
prog.cc: In instantiation of 'node<F>::node(FFwd&&) [with FFwd = node<F>::then(FThen&&) [with FThen = main()::<lambda()>; F = main()::<lambda()>]::<lambda()>; F = main()::<lambda()>]':
prog.cc:27:22: required from 'auto node<F>::then(FThen&&) [with FThen = main()::<lambda()>; F = main()::<lambda()>]'
prog.cc:35:56: required from here
prog.cc:17:46: error: no matching function for call to 'main()::<lambda()>::__lambda1(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)'
node(FFwd&& f) : _f{std::forward<FFwd>(f)}
^
prog.cc:35:20: note: candidate: 'constexpr main()::<lambda()>::<lambda>(const main()::<lambda()>&)'
auto f = node{[]{ return 0; }}.then([]{ return 0; });
^
wandbox
, node<F>::then, node{...} *this - . :
template <typename FThen>
auto then(FThen&& f_then)
{
auto l = [f_then = std::move(f_then)]{ return f_then(); };
return node<std::decay_t<decltype(l)>>{std::move(l)};
}
wandbox
..., .
, make_node?