Angular 4 versus reactive performance - theory versus reality

Question

It is basically the same old, the same old x vs y, what is faster?, but I hope my version is applicable. In addition, React and Angular are different, for example, GTK and Qt (or even more), and comparing them is stupid - one of the pre-made frameworks without any changes, while the other is a presentation structure designed to just do it. If my question is still unanswered or subjective and needs to be closed, write me a comment on how to improve it in the future, if possible. Thank.

This is a question about Angular 2+ vs React in terms of performance. My team should create one SPA for the same functionality with each structure.

Suppose:

• development time for both versions should be equal / similar
• non-view functionality (where Angular differs from view-only resolution) doesn't matter for measurement and development time, view updates are often and are a bottleneck
• stable operation is measured after the initial page load (therefore, all data for the page is in memory)
• both applications are built as recommended by the corresponding directory
• only for the client side, mainly with dynamic data (so there is not much server-side rendering or stand-by compilation)

Javascript VM is hard to argue, but my two questions are about their behavior:

• , JIT ( ) ?
• 2027 - - (, Chrome 256 Firefox 384). , / , . Javascript VMs/JIT , . , , 2027 ? : / " " ( : Javascript)?

PS: , 2027 , , - , . , " ", - . .

Answer 1

,

Angular , React. , , , , , , . , , Angular TypeScript . , React JSX, HTML JavaScript, JavaScript. PHP, , , , . 3-5 , , . Angular , .

, Redux, . , , .

, . Redux - , , , . , , . , , . , , .

, , , Vaadin, Spring Boot Angular . , - ?