How to compare two huge <String> lists in Java?
My application generates 2 large lists (up to string entries up to 3.5 millimeters). I need a better and faster way to compare it. I am currently doing it like this:
List list1 = ListUtils.subtract(sourceDbResults, hiveResults);
List list2 = ListUtils.subtract(hiveResults, sourceDbResults);
But this method is very expensive in memory, as I see from jconsole, and sometimes even process the stack on it. Any good solutions or ideas?
The element positions / order in the list is always the same, so I do not need to deal with it. After the comparison, I need to know if these lists match and get differences from this list if they do not match. Subtraction is great for small lists.
+4
1 answer
, , , O (N) , , , ListUtils. , , .
import java.util.*;
public class CompareSortedLists {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Integer> sourceDbResults = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8);
List<Integer> hiveResults = Arrays.asList(2, 3, 6, 7);
List<Integer> inSourceDb_notInHive = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> inHive_notInSourceDb = new ArrayList<>();
compareSortedLists(
sourceDbResults, hiveResults,
inSourceDb_notInHive, inHive_notInSourceDb);
assert inSourceDb_notInHive.equals(Arrays.asList(1, 4, 5, 8));
assert inHive_notInSourceDb.equals(Arrays.asList(6, 7));
}
/**
* Compares two sorted lists (or other iterable collections in ascending order).
* Adds to onlyInList1 any and all elements in list1 that are not in list2; and
* conversely to onlyInList2. The caller must ensure the two input lists are
* already sorted and should initialize onlyInList1 and onlyInList2 to empty,
* writable collections.
*/
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> void compareSortedLists(
Iterable<T> list1, Iterable<T> list2,
Collection<T> onlyInList1, Collection<T> onlyInList2) {
Iterator<T> it1 = list1.iterator();
Iterator<T> it2 = list2.iterator();
T e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
T e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
while (e1 != null || e2 != null) {
if (e2 == null) { // No more elements in list2, some remaining in list1
onlyInList1.add(e1);
e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
}
else if (e1 == null) { // No more elements in list1, some remaining in list2
onlyInList2.add(e2);
e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
}
else {
int comp = e1.compareTo(e2);
if (comp < 0) {
onlyInList1.add(e1);
e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
}
else if (comp > 0) {
onlyInList2.add(e2);
e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
}
else /* comp == 0 */ {
e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
}
}
}
}
}
Java 6 . PeekingIterator, , Apache Commons Guava, , , Java 8:
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> void compareSortedLists(
Iterable<T> list1, Iterable<T> list2,
Collection<T> onlyInList1, Collection<T> onlyInList2) {
PeekingIterator<T> it1 = new PeekingIterator<>(list1.iterator());
PeekingIterator<T> it2 = new PeekingIterator<>(list2.iterator());
while (it1.hasNext() && it2.hasNext()) {
int comp = it1.peek().compareTo(it2.peek());
if (comp < 0)
onlyInList1.add(it1.next());
else if (comp > 0)
onlyInList2.add(it2.next());
else /* comp == 0 */ {
it1.next();
it2.next();
}
}
it1.forEachRemaining(onlyInList1::add);
it2.forEachRemaining(onlyInList2::add);
}
+3