How to compare two huge <String> lists in Java?

My application generates 2 large lists (up to string entries up to 3.5 millimeters). I need a better and faster way to compare it. I am currently doing it like this:

List list1 = ListUtils.subtract(sourceDbResults, hiveResults);
List list2 = ListUtils.subtract(hiveResults, sourceDbResults);

But this method is very expensive in memory, as I see from jconsole, and sometimes even process the stack on it. Any good solutions or ideas?

The element positions / order in the list is always the same, so I do not need to deal with it. After the comparison, I need to know if these lists match and get differences from this list if they do not match. Subtraction is great for small lists.

+4
source share
1 answer

, , , O (N) , , , ListUtils. , , .

import java.util.*;

public class CompareSortedLists {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> sourceDbResults = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8);
        List<Integer> hiveResults = Arrays.asList(2, 3, 6, 7);
        List<Integer> inSourceDb_notInHive = new ArrayList<>();
        List<Integer> inHive_notInSourceDb = new ArrayList<>();

        compareSortedLists(
                sourceDbResults, hiveResults,
                inSourceDb_notInHive, inHive_notInSourceDb);

        assert inSourceDb_notInHive.equals(Arrays.asList(1, 4, 5, 8));
        assert inHive_notInSourceDb.equals(Arrays.asList(6, 7));
    }

    /**
     * Compares two sorted lists (or other iterable collections in ascending order).
     * Adds to onlyInList1 any and all elements in list1 that are not in list2; and
     * conversely to onlyInList2. The caller must ensure the two input lists are
     * already sorted and should initialize onlyInList1 and onlyInList2 to empty,
     * writable collections.
     */
    public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> void compareSortedLists(
            Iterable<T> list1, Iterable<T> list2,
            Collection<T> onlyInList1, Collection<T> onlyInList2) {
        Iterator<T> it1 = list1.iterator();
        Iterator<T> it2 = list2.iterator();
        T e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
        T e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
        while (e1 != null || e2 != null) {
            if (e2 == null) {  // No more elements in list2, some remaining in list1
                onlyInList1.add(e1);
                e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
            }
            else if (e1 == null) {  // No more elements in list1, some remaining in list2
                onlyInList2.add(e2);
                e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
            }
            else {
                int comp = e1.compareTo(e2);
                if (comp < 0) {
                    onlyInList1.add(e1);
                    e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
                }
                else if (comp > 0) {
                    onlyInList2.add(e2);
                    e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
                }
                else /* comp == 0 */ {
                    e1 = it1.hasNext() ? it1.next() : null;
                    e2 = it2.hasNext() ? it2.next() : null;
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

Java 6 . PeekingIterator, , Apache Commons Guava, , , Java 8:

public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> void compareSortedLists(
        Iterable<T> list1, Iterable<T> list2,
        Collection<T> onlyInList1, Collection<T> onlyInList2) {
    PeekingIterator<T> it1 = new PeekingIterator<>(list1.iterator());
    PeekingIterator<T> it2 = new PeekingIterator<>(list2.iterator());
    while (it1.hasNext() && it2.hasNext()) {
        int comp = it1.peek().compareTo(it2.peek());
        if (comp < 0)
            onlyInList1.add(it1.next());
        else if (comp > 0)
            onlyInList2.add(it2.next());
        else /* comp == 0 */ {
            it1.next();
            it2.next();
        }
    }
    it1.forEachRemaining(onlyInList1::add);
    it2.forEachRemaining(onlyInList2::add);
}
+3

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1667156/


All Articles