For me it seems like a bug in vsftpd.
, , 0,0,0,0, pasv_address , () IPv6.
, , IPv6- ( , , listen_ipv6=YES):
listen_ipv6=NO
listen=YES
- IPv6, EC2.
FTP-, ProFTPD.
ftplib IP-, .
. FTP ftplib, FTP
. , , vsftpd (3.0.3):
handle_pasv postlogin.c:
int is_ipv6 = vsf_sysutil_sockaddr_is_ipv6(p_sess->p_local_addr);
...
if (tunable_pasv_address != 0)
{
vsf_sysutil_sockaddr_alloc_ipv4(&s_p_sockaddr);
if (vsf_sysutil_inet_aton(tunable_pasv_address, s_p_sockaddr) == 0)
{
die("invalid pasv_address");
}
}
else
{
vsf_sysutil_sockaddr_clone(&s_p_sockaddr, p_sess->p_local_addr);
}
str_alloc_text(&s_pasv_res_str, "Entering Passive Mode (");
if (!is_ipv6)
{
str_append_text(&s_pasv_res_str, vsf_sysutil_inet_ntop(s_p_sockaddr));
}
else
{
const void* p_v4addr = vsf_sysutil_sockaddr_ipv6_v4(s_p_sockaddr);
if (p_v4addr)
{
str_append_text(&s_pasv_res_str, vsf_sysutil_inet_ntoa(p_v4addr));
}
else
{
str_append_text(&s_pasv_res_str, "0,0,0,0");
}
}
vsf_sysutil_sockaddr_ipv6_v4 0, s_p_sockaddr IPv6, , pasv_address.
sysutil.c:
const void*
vsf_sysutil_sockaddr_ipv6_v4(const struct vsf_sysutil_sockaddr* p_addr)
{
static unsigned char pattern[12] =
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0xFF, 0xFF };
const unsigned char* p_addr_start;
if (p_addr->u.u_sockaddr.sa_family != AF_INET6)
{
return 0;
}
if (vsf_sysutil_memcmp(pattern, &p_addr->u.u_sockaddr_in6.sin6_addr, 12))
{
return 0;
}
p_addr_start = (const unsigned char*)&p_addr->u.u_sockaddr_in6.sin6_addr;
return &p_addr_start[12];
}
, . ( ), IP- " " p_sess->p_local_addr, , pasv_address.
vsftpd.
PASV EPSV:
PASV EPSV: PASV IP- . 99,9% . , IP-.
EPSV , PASV, , IP- . , EPSV . IP- FTP- .
0,0,0,0 PASV, , , PASV.