Is there any difference (no matter how tiny) between the three default methods of the class constructor:
Directly in the header using {}:
{}
//foo.h class foo{ public: foo(){} }
Directly in the header using the keyword default:
default
//foo.h class foo{ public: foo()=default; }
In cpp using {}
//foo.h class foo{ public: foo(); } //foo.cpp #include "foo.h" foo::foo(){}
Yes, there is a difference.
1 3 . , , , . . , memcpy . ,
memcpy
:
//foo.h class foo{ public: foo(); } //foo.cpp #include "foo.h" foo::foo()=default;
, .
, foo(){}, [class.ctor]/6.
foo(){}
[class.ctor]/6
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1627777/More articles:Cannot Connect to Postgres Running in Docker from PGAdmin Running in Windows Host - dockerwhy mysqli left join returns another 1 row? - phpCan I use only one RecyclerView for three different maps with different designs? - androidHow to show blurry image before loading (e.g. in whatsapp) in ios? - iosHow to count result rows in pandas dataframe? - pythonDefault Values for Symfony - phpКак получить исходную ошибку SQL из UnexpectedRollbackException - javaThe default size of an ArrayList is javaWhy is my jQuery slidedown not working in my desk? - javascriptКакая разница между Mixins и сервисами на Emberjs - ember.jsAll Articles