I had the same requirements for a โprojectโ (rather a tool) a year ago, and I used Cassandra, and I did not regret it. In general, it fits very well. You can put quite a lot of data into a Cassandra cluster, and the performance is impressive (although you may need to tune it), and the natural order is a good thing.
, , , , , .
. , . . , , . - 2.1, ( order by ), , , . .
, (, ), , . , . - , - , .
Rowlength 2 , , , . , , . , ( //), .
. <, > = . SQL WHERE..
, , . , . - , , , .
, ~ 65000 .
, ( :))