If you try to serialize an object with a type field java.lang.Class, serializing it will result injava.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Attempted to serialize java.lang.Class: <some_class> Forgot to register a type adapter
Below is a snippet of code from com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapters.java
public final class TypeAdapters {
.
.
.
public static final TypeAdapter<Class> CLASS = new TypeAdapter<Class>() {
@Override
public void write(JsonWriter out, Class value) throws IOException {
if (value == null) {
out.nullValue();
} else {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Attempted to serialize java.lang.Class: "
+ value.getName() + ". Forgot to register a type adapter?");
}
}
.
.
.
}
Was this encoded in gson just to remind people if they "Forgot to register type adapter"?
As I see it, an object of type Classcan be easily serialized and deserialized using the following statements:
Serialization: clazz.getName()
Deserialize: Class.forName(className)
What could be the reason for the current implementation? Where am I wrong about this?
source
share