I am trying to use std::uniform_real_distribution<float>(a, b)to generate random floats, and I found a case where the result is equal to the upper limit b. According to:
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/random/uniform_real_distribution
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/uniform_real_distribution
this should not happen.
When using gcc-4.9.2and clang-3.5.0for me the following failures:
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <limits>
#include <random>
int main() {
float a = 1.0f;
float b = 1.001f;
size_t seed = 293846;
size_t n = 9830;
std::mt19937 rg(seed);
std::uniform_real_distribution< float > u(a, b);
for (size_t i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
float v = u(rg);
if (not (v < b)) {
std::cerr << "error: i=" << i
<< " v=" << std::scientific << std::setprecision(std::numeric_limits< double >::max_digits10) << v
<< " b=" << b << std::endl;
abort();
}
}
}
The output I see is:
error: i=9829 v=1.00100004673004150e+00 b=1.00100004673004150e+00
Aborted (core dumped)
Is this a bug with the standard library? Did I miss something?
Edit Have . Although this is not an exact duplicate, the question raised in this question is indeed covered by the answer to another question mentioned here.
LLVM : https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18767