Is it important to rebalance?

I have a repo with a development branch. Two developers work in their branches, b1 and b2, taken from the development branch. And the work, and when this is done, continue to push the changes to the origin. Then these branches are combined in development with the beginning (bit bucket).

I want to ask if it would be important for them to return their branches with development after each merge? Or just keep making more and more clicks until this function completes? What should be the right strategy here?

+4
source share
2 answers

There is no right strategy.

b1/b2 , . :

  • .
  • , , , .

, b1/b2 , . :

  • .., , .

2

  • , . , , , - , , , .

  • , , , , .

, / . , ? → rebase , . , , ? → .

+2

, .

:
1. F1
2. f1 .
3. f1.
4. f1, :
 - f1
 - f2

, , :
1. F1
2. A f1 .
3. f1.
4. B f1
5. f1 . f1
6. A f1.
7. f1, :
 - f1
 - f2

, , . , . , .

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1611390/


All Articles