It seems I need to explicitly say forallin order to have a parametric type in the data definition. For example, this
forall
data A = A (forall s. ST s (STUArray s Int Int))
will work while this one
data A = A (ST s (STUArray s Int Int))
will not.
Perhaps I am asking something too obvious, but the reason for this is not clear to me, because in most other cases you do not need an explicit forallparameter type; the compiler does this instead. What is the difference here?
There are two different places where you can go forall, only one of which is what you intend. The other is
data A = forall s . A (ST s (STUArray s Int Int))
GADT
data A where A :: ST s (STUArray s Int Int) -> A
ST s , . ST, .
ST
s
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1607488/More articles:Java deserialization: final variable value not assigned - javahttps://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://fooobar.com/questions/1607484/converting-addresses-to-symbol-offset&usg=ALkJrhh206e4bxNdDpW8sGF6NRjHy3dmagПробелы между столбцами в столбце stargazer type = "html" вывод таблицы - rR markdown: how to change style with css? - cssGitlab CI Ansible Deployment with Passwords - ansibleНе удалось получить токен-носитель от Azure AD для использования с API-приложением - authenticationTransferring an Eclipse project to a Studio project - androidHow to determine the orientation of an iOS device in the background? - iosxgboost xgb.dump tree coefficient - rXGBoost. How to get class probabilities from xgb.dump (multi: softprob target) - rAll Articles