Is it recommended to create an instance of the cryptographically protected OpenSSL or Crypto ++ random number generator, run it once and use it sequentially in several cryptographic operations, such as key generation, encryption, signature, etc.?
Will it be safe enough to handle multiple applications without compromising security?
Is it safe practice to use different PRNGs for each operation and sow them differently? Are there any nuances to consider?
PRNG. , , , , , , . " " , "", , . , , .
PRNG PRNG, , -. , . "" , , , .
, RNG , , , - random.org.
, , PRNG . , , - , PRNG.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1599107/More articles:Подключение к Oracle с использованием Oracle.ManagedDataAccess - c#How to implement iter method using static / dynamic dispatch? - rustПоле поиска полной загрузки Bootstrap - htmlSheet selection using Laravel-Excel - phpHow to check if an entry in a C # list exists using the search method - listPhonegap: Download large files to Windows phones - large-filesHow to expose the types generated by the Provider of type F # in C # and XAML - c #What is good architecture for ELK? - elasticsearchFuzzy usage // in XPath - xmlhttps://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://fooobar.com/questions/1599112/how-to-push-2044-zipcodes-in-bingmaps-without-the-error-an-expression-is-too-long-or-complex-to-compile&usg=ALkJrhijTVEu6a2QqTIgk6AL2af7216FZwAll Articles