Firstly, according to Debianβs policy , there is no need to use any specific file format debian/copyrightif the reader can easily tell which copyrights and license terms apply to the package or to individual files (and, of course, as long as these license terms are actually met ) I personally appreciate this when the packer uses the /1.0 copyright format; it is usually read much clearer.
License information debian/copyrightmust cover the copyright and licensing of the package you distribute, as well as any additional copyrights and licenses that you want to apply to your packaging.
, , ( ). , , .
, , , MIT/X11, BSD GPL. ( MIT/X11/BSD), . , , , "".
, . . , , , , , . /1.0.
( , , , ..)