I am trying to use clock_gettime () to monitor elapsed time. However, it returns poor results.
I tested it with the following:
#include <time.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <math.h>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int ns;
timespec tt;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,&tt);
int ns_start = tt.tv_nsec;
int s_start = tt.tv_sec;
int ns_base = 1000e6 - ns_start;
while(true)
{
cin.ignore();
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,&tt);
if(tt.tv_nsec >= ns_start) ns = tt.tv_nsec - ns_start;
else ns = tt.tv_nsec + ns_base;
cout << "Time Passed:\ts: " << tt.tv_sec-s_start << " ms: " << round(ns/1e6) << endl;
}
return 0;
}
When I hold a key for a while, I get a similar result:
Time Passed: s: 1 ms: 833
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 308
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 354
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 415
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 459
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 511
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 566
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 613
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 661
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 712
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 762
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 813
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 861
Time Passed: s: 2 ms: 920 // crap starts here
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 970
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 20
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 69
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 124
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 171
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 226
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 272
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 329
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 372
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 429
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 474
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 528
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 576
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 632
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 679
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 736
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 782
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 835
Time Passed: s: 3 ms: 880
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 939
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 982
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 38
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 84
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 143
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 188
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 244
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 291
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 348
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 391
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 448
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 493
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 549
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 594
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 650
Time Passed: s: 4 ms: 696
Time Passed: s: 6 ms: 259
Time Passed: s: 7 ms: 989
This should be obvious if you look at the numbers, the results of which are mixed up at the point of the comment.
Does anyone have any ideas as to why this is and how to fix it?
source
share