Since the call className()will execute the code in __init__(args), why is there someone explicitly calling in the code below __init__?
className()
__init__(args)
__init__
class Example(Frame): def __init__(self, parent): Frame.__init__(self, parent)
Is there a difference in the actual code that runs between the two method calls, or is chossing __init__()over className()just arbitrary?
__init__()
Running Python 3.4
className() , __init__. __new__, . Frame() self ; .
__new__
Frame()
self
__init__, __init__ , . , , , , .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1546185/More articles:Make a matrix of graphs with row and column names - r"isConnected" deprecated in iOS 7 - deprecatedRepeating time stamps in timers - Kassandra - cassandraCreating missing observations in panel data - rPrint all permutations of the top of the bottom line string - algorithmImages in Images.xcassets not showing when archiving an application? - iosFire and forget to use ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem or async waiting? - c #When should I use PHP Session vs Browser Local Storage vs JavaScript Object Parameters? - javascriptWhat would be the best way to track the value of $ index in a ng repeat? - javascriptUse JPA @StaticMetamodel classes without local persistence.xml? (Remote EJB) - javaAll Articles