It is expected that these two block sizes (1024x1 vs 32x32) will be executed in terms of thread scheduling and the memory bandwidth perspective? Is there an expected performance difference between these two block sizes? Note that both use 1024 threads per block.
Threadblock sizes, especially when we talk about the same number of threads per block, do not in themselves affect performance.
- warps. , . threadIdx.x, blockIdx.x .., , .
threadIdx.x
blockIdx.x
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1540294/More articles:Testing ModelForm Model with Unique Field = True - djangoHow to adjust the title and display the branch template without the renderView () method in the symfony2.X controller - http-headersAccess to 64-bit registry from Haskell - winapiHow to create a Google chart with a width and height of 100%? - javascriptCan I change the default behavior for all pads in a test - c #Do you have an onInstant survey first? - websocketHTML5 tag does not work in Internet Explorer - internet-explorerChrome flickers on -webkit filter: blur - htmlFirebase download performance - angularjsI have implemented xdomain scripts on both client and server, but in IE9 continue to receive the warning “Waiting to wait in iframe socket” - javascriptAll Articles