CMake or gyp for developing node.js add-ons

Question

In most tutorials, they use gyp as a building system to develop C ++ node.js add-ons. However, compared to gyp, CMake has a long history and has much more documentation.

So my question is this: which one is better for developing node.js C ++ addon?

Thank.

Answer 1

I just released my new module today: CMake.js to support native Node.js and io.js based on CMake add-on development. It works just like node -gyp, please take a look at readme and the tutorial, and then decide what is best for you.

Answer 2

gyp , , node. , v8 node .