I was looking for the answer to your question. There is jsperf.com which contains many javascript tests. Unfortunately, they only check the type of browser and its performance. You can find a test with many results so you can find out how well others performed.
You can even do your own jsperf test and test it on other computers.
Please note that the results depend on many parameters:
- What is a processor?
- ? (jsperf )
- / ( javascript)
- ( GB ram, .
- ,
Firefox 28
Windows 7, 64bit
AMD Phenom II x4, 2.8Ghz
jsperf: http://jsperf.com/native-vs-array-js-vs-underscore/8.
native
672,225 ±8.17%fastest
array.js
663,733 ±7.74%0.87% slower
underscore
622,637 ±7.96%7% slower
lo-dash
552,168 ±7.28%17% slower
sunspider: https://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
, ( ) . , .
:
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 285.1ms +/- 16.7%
--------------------------------------------
3d: 45.7ms +/- 4.9%
cube: 16.2ms +/- 8.0%
morph: 9.7ms +/- 3.6%
raytrace: 19.8ms +/- 5.6%
access: 20.2ms +/- 3.3%
binary-trees: 3.1ms +/- 7.3%
fannkuch: 8.4ms +/- 4.4%
nbody: 4.2ms +/- 7.2%
nsieve: 4.5ms +/- 8.4%
bitops: 14.3ms +/- 4.7%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 1.3ms +/- 26.6%
bits-in-byte: 4.5ms +/- 8.4%
bitwise-and: 2.0ms +/- 0.0%
nsieve-bits: 6.5ms +/- 5.8%
controlflow: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%
recursive: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%
crypto: 21.9ms +/- 6.4%
aes: 10.0ms +/- 10.7%
md5: 6.7ms +/- 5.2%
sha1: 5.2ms +/- 5.8%
date: 36.7ms +/- 30.1%
format-tofte: 15.1ms +/- 3.5%
format-xparb: 21.6ms +/- 50.9%
math: 22.7ms +/- 3.0%
cordic: 4.9ms +/- 4.6%
partial-sums: 15.0ms +/- 3.2%
spectral-norm: 2.8ms +/- 10.8%
regexp: 14.8ms +/- 4.4%
dna: 14.8ms +/- 4.4%
string: 106.2ms +/- 46.4%
base64: 9.8ms +/- 9.6%
fasta: 10.8ms +/- 5.2%
tagcloud: 24.3ms +/- 6.7%
unpack-code: 30.4ms +/- 10.9%
validate-input: 30.9ms +/- 150.4%
, . , .
!