I would like to use the visitor pattern in conjunction with smart pointers, but it seems that the compiler cannot detect the subclass and match the corresponding function.
I wrote an SSCE showing the problem:
test.hpp:
class Visitor;
class Area {
public:
virtual void visit(const Visitor& visitor) = 0;
};
class Area1 : public Area {
public:
virtual void visit(const Visitor& visitor);
};
class Area2 : public Area {
public:
virtual void visit(const Visitor& visitor);
};
class Visitor {
public:
virtual void visit(const Area1 &area) const = 0;
virtual void visit(const Area2 &area) const = 0;
};
test.cpp:
#include "test.hpp"
void Area1::visit(const Visitor& visitor) {
visitor.visit(*this);
}
void Area2::visit(const Visitor& visitor) {
visitor.visit(*this);
}
main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "boost/shared_ptr.hpp"
#include "test.hpp"
class FooVisitor : public Visitor {
virtual void visit(const Area1 &area) const {
std::cout <<"visit area1" <<std::endl;
};
virtual void visit(const Area2 &area) const {
std::cout <<"visit area2" <<std::endl;
}
};
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
boost::shared_ptr<Area> p(new Area2);
FooVisitor visitor;
visitor.visit(*p);
return 0;
}
The line visitor.visit (* p) gives the following error:
main.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
main.cpp:17:21: error: no matching function for call to ‘FooVisitor::visit(Area&)’
main.cpp:17:21: note: candidates are:
main.cpp:6:18: note: virtual void FooVisitor::visit(const Area1&) const
main.cpp:6:18: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘Area’ to ‘const Area1&’
main.cpp:9:18: note: virtual void FooVisitor::visit(const Area2&) const
main.cpp:9:18: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘Area’ to ‘const Area2&’
How can I help the compiler understand that a visit (const Area2 &) should be called without resorting to dynamic_cast attempts for each of the subtypes?
source
share