This is compatible with all existing DbModelBuilder extension methods, as it simply adds a free layer on top, but it does have some syntactic overhead. Not quite what you requested, but does not include flushing with support code. Not tested yet, but it should work if you like the syntax:
// First option - like this better because it has less cruft than multiple Has invocations var modelBuilder = new DbModelBuilder(); var modelConfiguration = new ModelConfigurator(modelBuilder); modelConfiguration.Entity<Product>().Has(e => { e.Property(en => en.Name).IsRequired(); e.Property(en => en.UPC).IsRequired(); e.Property(en => en.Price).IsRequired(); e.Property(en => en.Description).IsRequired();} );
OR
var modelBuilder = new DbModelBuilder(); var modelConfiguration = new ModelConfigurator(modelBuilder); modelConfiguration.Entity<Product>().Has(e => e.Property(en => en.Name).IsRequired()) .Has(e => e.Property(en => en.UPC).IsRequired()) .Has(e => e.Property(en => en.Price).IsRequired()) .Has(e => e.Property(en => en.Description).IsRequired());
Helper Code:
public class Product{ public string Name {get;set;} public double Price {get;set;} public string UPC {get;set;} public string Description {get;set;} } public class ModelConfigurator{ public DbModelBuilder ModelBuilder{get;set;} public ModelConfigurator(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder){ ModelBuilder = modelBuilder; } public EntityConfigurator<TEntity> Entity<TEntity>() where TEntity : class { var entity = ModelBuilder.Entity<TEntity>(); return new EntityConfigurator<TEntity>(entity); } } public class EntityConfigurator<TEntity> where TEntity : class{ public EntityTypeConfiguration<TEntity> EntityTypeConfiguration {get;set;} public EntityConfigurator(EntityTypeConfiguration<TEntity> entityTypeConfiguration){ EntityTypeConfiguration = entityTypeConfiguration; } public EntityConfigurator<TEntity> Has(Action<EntityTypeConfiguration<TEntity>> a){ a(this.EntityTypeConfiguration); return this; } }
source share