It looks like the table or section is locked (itβs quite reasonable during a bulk copy, especially if you have an explicit transaction), and this blocks the other inserts from competing bulk copies. That doesn't sound very surprising. The best I can say is ... don't do this. In particular, this is an IO-bound operation with your main lock, which is most likely to be a network, with the secondary limit being the internal server, which is also necessary to comply with the ACID rules that you specified. For these reasons, parallel execution of these operations is unlikely to give significant performance benefits, but it can very well cause timeouts due to blocking.
So: instead of doing it in parallel ... do them sequentially.
source share