I agree with what was previously called eulerfx. I would add that if you depend on the structure for using DDD and CQRS, then you take risks depending on the structure and do not understand what is happening. As a result, you may skip what DDD (and CQRS) provides you.
I declare that I began to learn CQRS using the framework (actually NCQRS), but my DDD knowledge was based on Evans' book, and I did not look for a framework for modeling my domain. Since each domain is unique to the problem, I find it difficult to really have a structure that "helps" you implement DDD.
In retrospect, I wish I had gone with NCQRS from the start, as I missed or conveyed some of the intricacies of the CQRS pattern.
There are probably some DDD databases, but I would recommend abandoning them and building your own. You will thank yourself later.
Hope this helps. Good luck
source share