What implementations were used in the C ++ Performance Technical Report, TR 18015?

Question

There are many tables in the C ++ Performance Technical Report that compare various C ++ implementations. Unfortunately, nothing is said about using the OS and the compiler. I wonder if this information is available informally or, at least, can be inferred from the technical report itself.

Answer 1

From page 23 in the report: “Most of the comments on runtime costs are based on a set of simple measurements performed on three different machine architectures using six different compilers , with different optimization options. Each test was run several times to ensure that the results are repeatable. Code presented in Appendix D :. The purpose of these measurements is not to obtain an accurate description of the optimal C ++ performance on a given machine and not to provide comparisons between compilers or and machine architecture, rather, the goal is to give developers an idea of ​​the relative costs of common language constructs using modern compilers, and to show what is possible (which, in principle, is possible for everyone).

So, I think, if you really want to know, you can ask the authors of the report.