UTF-8 ≠ Unicode
Note:
- ASCII is a subset of the ISO 8859-1 standard.
- ASCII is a subset of Unicode.
- ASCII is a subset of UTF-8.
- ISO 8859-1 is a subset of Unicode.
- ISO 8859-1 is not a subset of UTF-8.
- Unicode is not the same as UTF-8.
I highly recommend familiarizing yourself with the intricacies of modern terminology .
If this is too confusing, you can watch the Radix-50 , which has a repertoire of an order of magnitude smaller than Unicode, but nevertheless exhibits several of the same subtleties that now come out of people in relation to Unicode, the character repertoire, coded character sets, character encoding forms and character encoding schemes.
Java chars Unable to hold characters
Since you came to this with Java, it really is not your fault that these arent clearly sharing the concepts in your mind. This is because Java seriously confuses this problem by not separating the paragraph codes (logical characters) of the encoded character set from the empty and dirty mechanisms of one particular form of character encoding / STRONG>.
Javas unfortunate conflation chars with logical symbols are error prone in extreme mode; perhaps it would be more accurate to say that Java programmers are united in the same thing. In any case, now, there seems to be no hope for a cure.
Blame it all on hysterical porpoises if you want, but the most charitable thing you can say about it is that it is very unfortunate. Because of all this, sane and perfectly competent programmers, like you, will be easily confused forever, and therefore will constantly write Java code that is simple, clear and erroneous.
Education about all of this is the only possible palliative, but this is not a true cure.
source share