Another good analogy (especially for an engineering student) can be part of a machine.
Take the carburetor. Carburrettor A is designed to meet the specific characteristics of a particular engine, including the INTERFACE (usually sealed with a gasket, which also matches the interface) between the manifold and the carburetor.
There are certain openings on any surface that should align exactly like that, and it is expected that fuel will be supplied from the gas line to the carburetor at a certain pressure and volume. Carb is expected to deliver a specific air-fuel mixture to a manifold for a specific vacuum pressure, etc.
This is a good perspective for an open interface. Carb manufacturers do not need to know much about the engine, except for a template for the interface between their carburetor and manifold, as well as some specifications for the fuel-air mixture expected on the manifold. Similarly, the engine doesn’t care how the carburetor does what it does, it just needs to deliver the fuel under the right pressure to the proper hole in the manifold so that the carburetor can perform some kind of magical function and deliver the proper mixture of fuel air on request. Different manufacturers can achieve this in different ways, but as long as the inputs and outputs are the same, everything works fine.
INSIDE the carburetor, there is everything that happens to better control fuel flow, and measure vacuum pressure with pitot tubes, etc. They are akin to PRIVATE functions and methods. The means by which knwos carburetor, which, given the vacuum pressure X, I need to put the amount of fuel Y and the volume of air Z into the manifold.
While this does not necessarily do a good job of describing private member variables, getters vs seters, etc., MAY help with the concept of an interface, excapsulation and Private vs Public. For me it was initially more complicated than private member variables and such (especially the "Interface" part ...).
source share