jQuery is best suited for faΓ§ade design , as it "defines a higher-level interface that makes using subsystems easier." For example, .css() and .hide() are functions designed for ease of use, as well as the ability of jQuery to perform an action on several elements at once:
$('.foo').css({left: '100px', top: '100px'}).hide();
jQuery only seems to even match the decorator pattern in such a way as its animated functionality. Normal HTML DOM elements do not offer time-match animation and attached queues, so jQuery adds this. In most other areas, jQuery provides the same functionality that is available with direct access to the underlying DOM elements.
But even there, it really doesn't work, since jQuery does not "dynamically support the same interface."
source share