All geek questions in one place

Ruby Enterprise Edition vs Matz Ruby

I recently wrote a small RMS + CMS website to learn Ruby. I was a little surprised to see the use of Rails memory that feels a lot - but to be honest, I never looked at the use of my Django applications in memory.

Most users now recommend Ruby Enterprise Edition to reduce the memory footprint of your Rails applications. However, I was wondering why there is no official Ubuntu package. Does REE have an incompatible license, or is there something else funny about this? Ubuntu has pretty much a package for everything, why does it hesitate to accept REE?

Also, are there any compromises between REE and Matz 'Ruby?

+4
source share
2 answers

Ri is an unofficial form of Ruby. All this explains their FAQ, why there is a difference and why it does not merge with the ruby. Ubuntu may have some ree package, but no one creates it in the official ubuntu repository

http://www.rubyenterpriseedition.com/faq.html

+1
source

REE is fully compatible with the analogue of MRI (Matz's). One caveat is that REE is slowly replacing changes with MRI upstream. And don't worry, at the time of this writing, REE has combined all the changes with MRI 1.8.7-p334. Enjoy it!

I would like to see someone create the REE Debian package. If you think you have everything you need, why don't you try the packaging?

I had several servers running REE with Passenger Phusion, and they are very reliable and stable (I never fall for me). Therefore, he must answer your question if he acts funny or not.

0
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1334046/

More articles:


All Articles