All geek questions in one place

Which is more convenient: TortoiseGit or TortoiseHG?

I experimented using Mercurial and TortoiseHG to track my work when I work remotely (with a slow VPN, I don't want to mess with SVN if I have something that works).
I found TortoiseHG a little harder to use - or at least it often doesn't work as I expect, so I'm considering switching to GIT and TortoiseGIT. (For example, I had problems rolling back the source code to an earlier version, and I still don't know what I did wrong)

My question is whether they have the same level of functionality / user convenience or one better than the other. What is your experience?

Update for those interested in the topic:
My company has moved to GIT, and we use GitExtensions instead of Tortoise.
I am really happy with that.

+4
source share
1 answer

I am using TortoiseHg 1.1.7. I switched to the new version some time ago and quickly switched because I did not like the interface. If you don’t like what you have now, then you should try other options (what you like will greatly depend on what other interface you are familiar with), but I recommend including an old version of TortoiseHg of things to try . Hg has better Windows compatibility than Git.

+1
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1302957/

More articles:


All Articles