The reason Lisp is connected to AI is because when AI was really new, there weren’t so many of them, and the other languages of the day were unacceptable. Now there is much more diversity in the AI field, and most languages, at least until the 70s, are LISP. Thus, there is not a single dominant language.
If you are interested in AI, stop worrying about the language and start teaching methods. Language does not matter.
Other notes:
I study computational linguistics (which is an area of AI that often uses machine learning methods) at Indiana University, and Python is the most popular choice for prototyping in IU. But not the vast majority. In general, computational linguistics does not have a dominant language for research. A lot of software has been released in Java and C / C ++ because these languages are fast and portable. (I run a couple of Java parsers in the background when I enter this value.)
I only know one or two groups that still use Common LISP. I have not heard anyone do research using Clojure, but it is very good there. As for other new functional languages, F # is used by Microsoft to develop AI-esque things, but not necessarily for research. I personally use Haskell for many things, but this is not a general choice as far as I know.
source share