Should I give priority to the semantic marking of my pages? Or is the Semantic Internet a good idea that can never go crazy?

Question

The Semantic Web is a terrific idea. And there are many really cool things that have been done using the concept of the semantic network. But after all this time, I begin to wonder if this is all just a dream in the end. If we really manage to create a fully semantic website, and if we cannot use the semantic website to provide our users with a deeper online experience, it is worth the time and additional effort to ensure the completeness of the semantic web page is created by me or my team ?

I know that semantic pages usually turn out to be better (more from attention to detail than everything I think), so I will not doubt the attempt to create a semantic page, which I’m thinking about now, gives up the process of reviewing and revising the creation of a partially semantic page completely semantic in the hope of some return in the future.

Answer 1

At a practical level, some aspects of the semantic network are removed:

1) Semantic markup helps search engines identify key content and improve keyword results.

2) Online identity is growing, and semantic markup in links such as rel = 'me' helps eliminate these things. Autodiscovering social connections is definitely coming. (Twitter uses XFN markup for all your information and your friends, for example)

3) Google (and possibly others) are starting to pay attention to microformats, such as hCard and hCalendar, to gather more information about people and events. This feature is still on the "very new" list, but these microformats are useful examples of the semantic network.

This may take some time, but there are certain potential benefits. These days, I would not put much effort into this, but it is definitely worth keeping in mind when you develop a site.

Answer 2

Yahoo and Google have announced support for RDFa annotations in your HTML content. Check out Yahoo SearchMonkey and Google Rich Snippets. If you care about SEO and manage the traffic on your site, these are good ways to improve the quality of search engines today.

In addition, the Common Tag dictionary is an RDFa dictionary for annotating and organizing your content using semantic tags. Yahoo and Google will use these annotations, and existing publishing platforms such as Drupal 7 will explore the use of the Common Tag format.

Answer 3

It should be search engine friendly, but further promotion will not provide a good return on investment.

Besides what you sell? Most of the goals underlying semantics that cannot be indexed are to simplify the integration of third-party developers and data mining (creating these ontologies). Are these desirable traits for your datasets? If you sell ads, which makes it easier for others to access your content, it probably won't be useful.

All that you want to spend your time about.

Answer 4

I would say no.

The reason I would say this is because the current return to create a fully semantic web page is now almost nil. You will have to spend extra time and effort, and now very little is shown for this.

Efforts are not like investing, so doing it now does not have practical advantages. If the semantic network begins to show potential, then you can always return to it and use it later.

Answer 5

You must not do anything without a requirement. Otherwise, how do you know if you succeeded? Do you have a requirement to be semantic? How many? How do you measure success? How do you rate your return on investment?

Don't do anything just because of quirks if you don't need to maintain quirks.

Answer 6

Let me ask you a question - would you live in a house or would you buy a car that was not built to specification?

"Is it also 4x4 lumber supported by steel T-Beam?"
"No ... we managed to build a foundation on the PVC pipeline ... pretty cool, yes."