@ Andy Lester claims the original request form is more efficient than using the NVL. I decided to check this statement:
SQL> DECLARE 2 CURSOR B IS 3 SELECT batch_id, equipment_id 4 FROM batch; 5 v_t1 NUMBER; 6 v_t2 NUMBER; 7 v_c1 NUMBER; 8 v_c2 NUMBER; 9 v_b INTEGER; 10 BEGIN 11 -- Form 1 of the where clause 12 v_t1 := dbms_utility.get_time; 13 v_c1 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time; 14 FOR R IN B LOOP 15 SELECT COUNT(*) 16 INTO v_b 17 FROM batch 18 WHERE equipment_id = R.equipment_id OR (equipment_id IS NULL AND R.equipment_id IS NULL); 19 END LOOP; 20 v_t2 := dbms_utility.get_time; 21 v_c2 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time; 22 dbms_output.put_line('For clause: WHERE equipment_id = R.equipment_id OR (equipment_id IS NULL AND R.equipment_id IS NULL)'); 23 dbms_output.put_line('CPU seconds used: '||(v_c2 - v_c1)/100); 24 dbms_output.put_line('Elapsed time: '||(v_t2 - v_t1)/100); 25 26 -- Form 2 of the where clause 27 v_t1 := dbms_utility.get_time; 28 v_c1 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time; 29 FOR R IN B LOOP 30 SELECT COUNT(*) 31 INTO v_b 32 FROM batch 33 WHERE NVL(equipment_id,'xxxx') = NVL(R.equipment_id,'xxxx'); 34 END LOOP; 35 v_t2 := dbms_utility.get_time; 36 v_c2 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time; 37 dbms_output.put_line('For clause: WHERE NVL(equipment_id,''xxxx'') = NVL(R.equipment_id,''xxxx'')'); 38 dbms_output.put_line('CPU seconds used: '||(v_c2 - v_c1)/100); 39 dbms_output.put_line('Elapsed time: '||(v_t2 - v_t1)/100); 40 END; 41 / For clause: WHERE equipment_id = R.equipment_id OR (equipment_id IS NULL AND R.equipment_id IS NULL) CPU seconds used: 84.69 Elapsed time: 84.8 For clause: WHERE NVL(equipment_id,'xxxx') = NVL(R.equipment_id,'xxxx') CPU seconds used: 124 Elapsed time: 124.01 PL/SQL procedure successfully completed SQL> select count(*) from batch; COUNT(*) ---------- 20903 SQL>
I was surprised to find out how true Andy was. This is almost 50% more than the NVL solution. Thus, while one piece of code may not look as neat or elegant as another, it can be significantly more efficient. I performed this procedure several times, and the results were almost the same every time. Kudos to Andy ...
DCookie Oct 10 '08 at 16:12 2008-10-10 16:12
source share