The correct answer, which should give a full point, would be: compile the code with all the warnings turned on, and you will not finish writing crappy code like this.
gcc test.c -std=c11 -pedantic-errors -Wall -Wextra test.c: In function 'main': test.c:6:3: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] int Multi[2][3][2] = {14,11,13,10,9,6,8,7,1,5,4,2}; ^
However, I suspect that your teacher is not so much concerned that the code is crappy, but rather looking for C language details that allow you to initialize arrays (and structures) even if the list of brackets does not match the initialization structure.
As for the C language, int Multi[2][3][2] = {14,11,13,10,9,6,8,7,1,5,4,2} completely equivalent:
// properly written initialization list for a 3D array int Multi[2][3][2] = { { {14, 11}, {13, 10}, { 9, 6} }, { { 8, 7}, { 1, 5}, { 4, 2} } };
The only rationale for why the first form is allowed is that it allows you to write things like
int Multi[2][3][2] = {0};
which explicitly initializes the first element to 0 and the rest of the elements, as if they had a static storage duration (0 also). The value of all elements will be set to zero.
Writing things like int Multi[2][3][2] = {14,11,13,10,9,6,8,7,1,5,4,2} is abusing C. It's very bad practice. This is prohibited by MISRA-C etc.
A good teacher will take care of teaching you how to enable all compiler warnings and how to properly initialize multidimensional arrays, rather than letting you interpret confusing, meaningless code.