I like how the Openmodelica test results look, see
Although I have no idea how they do it. Obviously, some kind of regression testing is being carried out with preservation of the previous results, but I donβt know if it was obtained from some testing library or made independently.
In general, I find it rather sad / suboptimal that there is no βone-stopβ testing solution that everyone can / should use everything (see, for example, the nose or pytest in the python ecosystem), instead everyone seems to be preparing their own solutions (or trying), and all you find is some Modelica conference documents (often without a trace of implementation) or an unattended library with unknown status.
At the top of my head I found / know (some are already linked in other answers here)
This is similar to a pathological instance https://xkcd.com/927/ . It is impossible for a user (not dev) to know which one to choose, which is actually good / usable / available / ...
(Not real testing, but also relevant: analysis and semantic analysis using ANTLR: modelica.org/events/Conference2003/papers/h31_parser_Tiller.β pdf)
source share