It is possible. Rendering may vary depending on the font format. Using this:
<link href='https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=ABeeZee' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>
Gives (more or less, varies depending on the browser) this stylesheet:
@font-face { font-family: 'ABeeZee'; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; src: local('ABeeZee'), local('ABeeZee-Regular'), url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/abeezee/v9/TV7JXr7j4tW7mgYreANhGQ.woff2) format('woff2'); }
On the other hand, the stylesheet from localfont:
@font-face { font-family: 'ABeeZee'; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; src: url('/fonts/ABeeZee-regular/ABeeZee-regular.eot'); src: url('/fonts/ABeeZee-regular/ABeeZee-regular.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'), local('ABeeZee'), local('ABeeZee-regular'), url('/fonts/ABeeZee-regular/ABeeZee-regular.woff2') format('woff2'), url('/fonts/ABeeZee-regular/ABeeZee-regular.woff') format('woff'), url('/fonts/ABeeZee-regular/ABeeZee-regular.ttf') format('truetype'), url('/fonts/ABeeZee-regular/ABeeZee-regular.svg#ABeeZee') format('svg'); }
This second css has a font in many formats, and the browser will use the first, which it can understand, which may not be the one used in another css.
On the other hand, the font file itself may be different, ABeeZee is downloaded from localfont (right now) 13 KB, but from Google it is 17 KB. Since they are not the same file, you can expect different results.
source share