This question is related to the Java UCSD course, am I right?
I think you should provide enough information for this issue so that it does not confuse people who want to provide some help. And here I have my own solution, which has already been verified by a test case from the local program, as well as OJ from UCSD.
You have missed important information about the definition of a syllable in this matter. In fact, I believe that the key to this problem is how you should deal with e . For example, suppose a combination te exists. And if you put te in the middle of a word, of course, it should be considered a syllable; However, if this is at the end of the word, e should be considered as silent e in English, therefore it should not be considered as a syllable.
What is it. And I would like to write down my thought using some pseudocode:
if(last character is e) { if(it is silent e at the end of this word) { remove the silent e; count the rest part as regular; } else { count++; } else { count it as regular; } }
You may find that I am not only using regex to solve this problem. Actually, I thought about this: is it really possible to make this question only using regular expression? My answer is no, I don’t think so. At least right now, with the knowledge that UCSD gives us, it's too hard to do. Regex is a powerful tool, it can display the desired characters very quickly. However, the regular expression lacks some functionality. Take te as an example again, the regular expression won’t be able to think twice when it refers to a word like teate (for example, I composed this word). If our regex pattern counts the first te as a syllable, then why isn't the last te ?
Meanwhile, UCSD actually talked about this in the assignment document:
If you find yourself doing mental gymnastics in order to create one regular expression for directly counting syllables, this usually indicates that there is a simpler solution (hint: consider a cycle over symbols - see the following hint below). Just because a piece of code (such as a regular expression) is shorter does not mean that it is always better.
The hint here is that you should think about this problem along with some loop matching regex.
OK, I should finally show my code:
protected int countSyllables(String word) { // TODO: Implement this method so that you can call it from the // getNumSyllables method in BasicDocument (module 1) and // EfficientDocument (module 2). int count = 0; word = word.toLowerCase(); if (word.charAt(word.length()-1) == 'e') { if (silente(word)){ String newword = word.substring(0, word.length()-1); count = count + countit(newword); } else { count++; } } else { count = count + countit(word); } return count; } private int countit(String word) { int count = 0; Pattern splitter = Pattern.compile("[^aeiouy]*[aeiouy]+"); Matcher m = splitter.matcher(word); while (m.find()) { count++; } return count; } private boolean silente(String word) { word = word.substring(0, word.length()-1); Pattern yup = Pattern.compile("[aeiouy]"); Matcher m = yup.matcher(word); if (m.find()) { return true; } else return false; }
You may find that in addition to this countSyllables method, I also create two additional methods, countit and silente . countit intended for counting syllables inside a word, silente tries to understand that this word ends with silent e . And it should also be noted that the definition is not silent e . For example, the should be considered not silent e , and ate is considered silent e .
And now the status of my code has already passed the test, both from the local test case and from OJ from UCSD:

And from OJ the test result:

PS: It should be nice to use something like [^ aeiouy] directly, because the word is parsed before we call this method. It is also necessary to make changes to lowercase letters, which will save a lot of work associated with capital letters. We need only the number of syllables. Speaking of number, the elegant way is to define count as static, so a private method can directly use count++ internally. But now all is well.
Feel free to contact me if you have not yet received a method for this question :)