IronRuby Dead?

Question

I am a .Net programmer who wants to branch out and possibly use some Ruby in my current and future web applications. Looking at the Iron Ruby Website , the last release was almost a year ago: March 13, 2011. No announcements have been made on their website since that time.

This raises several questions:

• Is IronRuby Dead Really?
• If the project is dead, are there any alternatives integrated into .Net?
• If he is alive, is this still an actively supported project? Where can I find the latest issue?
• Am I barking the wrong tree? Should I leave ruby ​​as ruby ​​and .Net as .Net, have two separate objects never been found in the same project?

I recently met IronRuby questions on stackoverflow, so obviously people are using it. I'm not sure if they support legacy applications or do new developments.

Answer 1

Pro-tip: developers hate ads. We are antisocial beings. IronRuby was last completed 5 days ago (at time of publication). So he is very lively.

https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/Languages/Ruby

Answer 2

I think that the number of people who are actively working on a project (actually sending corrections) is directly related to how useful this project is for the community. Unfortunately, during the year the project was disconnected from Microsoft, there was not a huge influx of people willing to work on IronRuby. Either this means that it is not important for the .NET community as a whole, or the .NET community is more likely to use it than help build it. In any case, development has definitely slowed down; Thomas and I have another full-time job, and no one has stepped up anymore, so the current pace of development is what we foresee. Unless, of course, this motivates people. :)

If IronRuby doesn’t work for you, send a question or transfer request to GitHub . Select the required requests.

Answer 3

Regarding question 1: http://evain.net/blog/articles/2010/08/07/on-ironruby

“The good news is that IronPython, IronRuby, and DLR are open source and have recently been re-licensed under the Apache2 license. The official announcement that IronRubys is now in the community’s hands.”

So yes, it was laid down by the developers. However, the community keeps him alive.

As for 2 and 3, I can not answer this, but for 4: I will not see any problems until they interfere with each other. Multi-language development is not new today. but wisely choose what you will use. Always try to compare things with your needs and preferences.

Update: I see that the inscription above / below me (lol?) Found a link that she was still alive. Nice to see that. I didn’t notice this!

Answer 4

It seems that we are at the end of 2014, and the work seems to be stopped.

A package in NuGet since 2011, Ruby is moving forward in 2.0+, and they have not shown any new progress, commit, try, anything. Someone even transferred it to Gitub, but to a large extent, nothing was done.

So at the moment this is pretty dead, maybe some kind of ambitious future for Ruby 2 or 3, but I really doubt that he sees how BIG Dynamic, CLR and Roslyn grow. I understand why they have lost so much space on the agenda of programmers.

Not to mention the future of F #.

Edit: Another thing that has changed since the answers were made: MS dumps Iron communities into the community.

Edit2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IronRuby Cited as Abandonware.

Answer 5

For Python, there is the just released Python Tools for Visual Studio (PTVS) . This is pretty solid and seems like a worthy successor to IronPython.

Hopefully Microsoft is investing in a similar version for Ruby in the near future.