Each tutorial / explanation that I see where HTML5 backup options are discussed uses this type of markup as an example:
<video autoplay> <source src="/myvideo.mp4" type="video/mp4"> <source src="/myvideo.webm" type="video/webm"> Sorry, your browser doesn't support HTML5 video. </video>
So my question is: why does everyone suggest putting MP4 in front of the Webm format? If your browser supports Webm, it almost certainly supports MP4 ... The aforementioned markup essentially guarantees that more efficient Webm video will never be used, although it may improve compression and reduce bandwidth. Why is this?
Am I missing something about how video backups work?
source share