May be.
The TR point (and now the technical specifications) should allow something to mature, regardless of the standard iteration process. They can publish TS, see how it works, see if there are any problems when implementing and / or using this function, and if everything works, they will be able to βminimizeβ it to the full standard.
Each TS is reviewed essentially to see if it will add up to the next standard.
See http://isocpp.org/std/status (thanks @BenjaminLindley) for the current status of the technical specifications working groups.
Any of them, if it is completed long before 2017, can be folded into a standard. It is unlikely that they will all be.
The goal is that we can get the std::experimental functions to play with (and use if we are ready to accept ground displacement under our feet) earlier, while having functions added after std with less regrets and specification changes after that point . There are probably also huge organizational overhead advantages for decoupling the main line standard from each of these side projects and ensuring their independent evolution.
source share