No break in SwipeRefreshLayout.java in android 5 onInterceptTouchEvent module

I noticed that in this function there is no gap after Action_down, then the code can work in ACTION_MOVE, is this correct?

@Override public boolean onInterceptTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) { ensureTarget(); final int action = MotionEventCompat.getActionMasked(ev); if (mReturningToStart && action == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) { mReturningToStart = false; } if (!isEnabled() || mReturningToStart || canChildScrollUp() || mRefreshing) { // Fail fast if we're not in a state where a swipe is possible return false; } switch (action) { case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN: setTargetOffsetTopAndBottom(mOriginalOffsetTop - mCircleView.getTop(), true); mActivePointerId = MotionEventCompat.getPointerId(ev, 0); mIsBeingDragged = false; final float initialMotionY = getMotionEventY(ev, mActivePointerId); if (initialMotionY == -1) { return false; } mInitialMotionY = initialMotionY; //-------NO Break here, why? It will run down to ACTION_MOVE case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE: if (mActivePointerId == INVALID_POINTER) { Log.e(LOG_TAG, "Got ACTION_MOVE event but don't have an active pointer id."); return false; } final float y = getMotionEventY(ev, mActivePointerId); if (y == -1) { return false; } final float yDiff = y - mInitialMotionY; if (yDiff > mTouchSlop && !mIsBeingDragged) { mIsBeingDragged = true; mProgress.setAlpha(STARTING_PROGRESS_ALPHA); } break; case MotionEventCompat.ACTION_POINTER_UP: onSecondaryPointerUp(ev); break; case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP: case MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL: mIsBeingDragged = false; mActivePointerId = INVALID_POINTER; break; } return mIsBeingDragged; } 

I don’t know why to treat ACTION_DOWN and then directly access ACTION_MOVE, is this correct? thanks in advance.

+5
source share
1 answer

Finally, I am publishing a bug report in google code, it has been adopted in a future version. No break in SwipeRefreshLayout.java in android 5 onInterceptTouchEvent module

+1
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1205249/


All Articles