Not a good idea - for various reasons.
MORE REASONS, WHY NOT 1) The obvious possible conflict with the reserved names 2) If after two years you want to make a global replacement in your code for the word "user" in the form field or in any place where you were screwed when using common names 3) If you need to look for cases that use the "user" in your code, you know where this happens (we have more than a million lines of code, this will kill us).
WHAT WE ARE 1) each table name has a unique start, such as O_nnn for F_nnn objects for financial data ... we applied the same to fields like opp_created for the opportunity created by date, SUSR_RID to refer to the user ID within the function sales compared to the OPUSR_RID operational link to the user ... 2) In addition to the prefix, we use as obvious names as possible, such as O_FlightArrivalTime, and not O_FltAT. Databases today do not show performance degradation with longer names. 3) Now, when you use OF_FlightArrivalTime as the form name, you can easily find the association, but the global search O_F ... will only search the DB field, search OF_F ... form fields and _F .... both,
Axel Schultze Nov 15 '14 at 16:03 2014-11-15 16:03
source share