Best IT Recipes

C ++ 11 compiler: Closer to the standard and how close?

I'm more interested in learning about C ++ now that C ++ 11 seems to have been ratified. Which compiler currently implements the closest thing available for full C ++ 11 support? How close is the specified compiler to full support? Are there any other main missing functions or just persuasions of a language lawyer?

+48
c ++ compiler-construction standards c ++ 11
Aug 29 '11 at 16:23
source share
6 answers

There is a support matrix on the Apache wiki.

+59
Aug 29 2018-11-18T00:
source share

I think Scott Meyers on his homepage is very good:

http://www.aristeia.com/C++0x/C++0xFeatureAvailability.htm

+14
Aug 29 '11 at 19:21
source share

The llvm C ++ clang compiler has partial C ++ 11 support; You can see its current status at http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html .

+5
Aug 29 '11 at 16:26
source share

There is also a GCC C ++ 0x status page (or C ++ 11): http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html

+5
Aug 29 2018-11-11T00:
source share

The IBM xlC ++ compiler has a basic page for supporting C ++ 11 functions .

0
Nov 24 2018-11-11T00:
source share

For anyone reading this now, since January 2013, Clang 3.2 is probably the most comprehensive C ++ 11 compiler, although the last Dev GCC branch (4.8.x) is about to bring GCC back to its original position.

http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html

Just look at this support table! Epic stuff. This only applies to currently available stable versions, and the GCC table contains about 4.8 entries.

As I said, when GCC 4.8 gets into a stable release, it will again be tight between the two:

http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html

0
Jan 28 '13 at 13:27
source share


More articles:


All Articles