Chrome extension increased. How have you progressed?

Question

There are several apps in my business in the google online store. I noticed this error later this morning in my account. One of the applications removed a test application that was not listed, so this is not a big problem. However, one of the applications is a production application that serves 6438 users.

Taken https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tenfold-email-test/pehljafncgpipopidmjncmcjeeadbdfh

Waiting for a review - production application https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tenfold/ibgkfepjabgnmpjojcnbcjfgeoklfdfk

The livelihood of 40 people depends on who is pending consideration to stay away. I’m happy to abide by Google’s terms and services. The problem is that Google is unclear regarding the problem. Google did not send me an email or did not tell me what happened to the violation of the terms and services.

Simply put, how can I meet the conditions and services if I do not know what conditions and services I am violating? Does anyone else have a similar experience? If so, how did you decide and how long did the process take?

Answer 1

Here are some helpful tips. The main problem is that Google does not describe these problems when they occur. They will vaguely refer you to a violation of their "conditions and services." Unfortunately, their terms and services are long, verbose, and difficult to understand. This is like finding a needle in a haystack.

Notify Google

• Send an email to the following google addresses with your problem.

  • [e-mail]
  • [e-mail]

• Submit a question here https://support.google.com/chrome_webstore/contact/developer_support

Potential problems

• Google has become tougher in single-purpose applications. The problem with SPA is that the definition is really broad. But they give some recommendations. https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/single_purpose - check if your application has problems.

  • There is a problem in the code or how it was encoded. Guarantee that.

  • All files and code are included in the item package.

  • All code inside the package is publicly available to humans (not obfuscated or reduced code).
  • Avoid requesting or executing remotely hosted code (including by reference
  • remote javascript files or executable code received using XHR requests).

In the note here, one thing that bothers me is that I see sooooo many applications that break the problem with deleted javascript files. The problem here is that automatic code checks rarely work in these applications, and therefore they encounter this problem if they pass the initial check. So this is really strange because Google penalizes applications that insert all their code files and are updated frequently (because they are checked more often)

2. There is an NSAPI violation https://www.chromium.org/developers/npapi-deprecation